Premium
Predictability of tropical cyclone intensity: scale‐dependent forecast error growth in high‐resolution stochastic kinetic‐energy backscatter ensembles
Author(s) -
Judt Falko,
Chen Shuyi S.,
Berner Judith
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.2626
Subject(s) - predictability , perturbation (astronomy) , asymmetry , tropical cyclone , mesoscale meteorology , meteorology , statistical physics , vortex , wavenumber , physics , mathematics , environmental science , climatology , computational physics , geology , statistics , optics , quantum mechanics
A systematic study of the intrinsic predictability of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity is conducted using a set of cloud‐resolving model ensembles of Hurricane Earl (2010). The ensembles are perturbed with a stochastic kinetic‐energy backscatter scheme (SKEBS) and started from identical initial conditions. Scale‐dependent error growth is investigated by imposing stochastic perturbations with various spatial scales on the TC and its environment. Predictability limits (upper bound) are determined by computing the error magnitude associated with each component of the Fourier‐decomposed TC wind fields at forecast times up to 7 days. Three SKEBS ensembles with different perturbation scales are used to investigate the effects of small‐scale, mesoscale and large‐scale uncertainties on the predictability of TC intensity. In addition, the influence of the environmental flow is investigated by perturbing the lateral boundary conditions. It is found that forecast errors grow rapidly on small scales (azimuthal wave numbers > 20), which saturate within 6–12 h in all four ensembles, regardless of perturbation scale. Errors grow relatively slower on scales corresponding to rain bands (wave numbers 2–5), limiting the predictability of these features to 1–5 days. Earl 's mean vortex and the wave number‐1 asymmetry are comparatively resistant to error growth and remain predictable for at least 7 days. Forecast uncertainty of the mean vortex and wave number‐1 asymmetry is greater in the large‐scale perturbation and perturbed lateral boundary condition ensembles. The results from this case indicate that the predictability of the mean vortex and wave number‐1 asymmetry is predominately associated with the predictability of the large‐scale environment, which is generally much longer than that of convective‐scale processes within the TC.