z-logo
Premium
The composite‐tendency Robert–Asselin–Williams ( RAW ) filter in semi‐implicit integrations
Author(s) -
Amezcua Javier,
Williams Paul D.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.2391
Subject(s) - discretization , filter (signal processing) , stability (learning theory) , truncation (statistics) , nonlinear system , truncation error , limit (mathematics) , computer science , mathematics , algorithm , mathematical analysis , physics , statistics , quantum mechanics , machine learning , computer vision
Time discretization in weather and climate models introduces truncation errors that limit the accuracy of the simulations. Recent work has yielded a method for reducing the amplitude errors in leap‐frog integrations from first‐order to fifth‐order. This improvement is achieved by replacing the Robert–Asselin filter with the Robert–Asselin–Williams ( RAW ) filter and using a linear combination of unfiltered and filtered states to compute the tendency term. The purpose of the present article is to apply the composite‐tendency RAW ‐filtered leap‐frog scheme to semi‐implicit integrations. A theoretical analysis shows that the stability and accuracy are unaffected by the introduction of the implicitly treated mode. The scheme is tested in semi‐implicit numerical integrations in both a simple nonlinear stiff system and a medium‐complexity atmospheric general circulation model and yields substantial improvements in both cases. We conclude that the composite‐tendency RAW ‐filtered leap‐frog scheme is suitable for use in semi‐implicit integrations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here