Premium
Foehn jets over the Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctica
Author(s) -
Elvidge Andrew D.,
Renfrew Ian A.,
King John C.,
Orr Andrew,
LachlanCope Tom A.,
Weeks Mark,
Gray Sue L.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.2382
Subject(s) - geology , mesoscale meteorology , ice shelf , climatology , flow (mathematics) , jet (fluid) , cold front , peninsula , atmospheric sciences , sea ice , mechanics , geography , cryosphere , physics , archaeology
Previously unknown foehn jets have been identified to the east of the Antarctic Peninsula ( AP ) above the Larsen C Ice Shelf. These jets have major implications for the east coast of the AP , a region of rapid climatic warming and where two large sections of ice shelf have collapsed in recent years. During three foehn events across the AP , leeside warming and drying is seen in new aircraft observations and simulated well by the Met Office Unified Model ( MetUM ) at ∼1.5 km grid spacing. In case A, weak southwesterly flow and an elevated upwind inversion characterise a highly nonlinear flow regime with upwind flow blocking. In case C strong northwesterly winds characterise a relatively linear case with little upwind flow blocking. Case B resides somewhere between the two in flow regime linearity. The foehn jets – apparent in aircraft observations where available and MetUM simulations of all three cases – are mesoscale features (up to 60 km in width) originating from the mouths of leeside inlets. Through back trajectory analysis they are identified as a type of gap flow. In cases A and B the jets are distinct, being strongly accelerated relative to the background flow, and confined to low levels above the Larsen C Ice Shelf. They resemble the ‘shallow foehn’ of the Alps. Case C resembles a case of ‘deep foehn’, with the jets less distinct. The foehn jets are considerably cooler and moister relative to adjacent regions of calmer foehn air. This is due to a dampened foehn effect in the jet regions: in case A the jets have lower upwind source regions, and in the more linear case C there is less diabatic warming and precipitation along jet trajectories due to the reduced orographic uplift across the mountain passes.