Premium
Erratum: Combining p‐values in large‐scale genomics experiments. DOI: 10.1002/pst.304 . Pharmaceut. Statist. 2007; 6: 217–226
Author(s) -
Zaykin Dmitri,
Zhivotovsky Lev,
Czika Wendy,
Shao Susan,
Wolfinger Russell
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
pharmaceutical statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1539-1612
pISSN - 1539-1604
DOI - 10.1002/pst.356
Subject(s) - monotonic function , combinatorics , table (database) , graph , mathematics , sentence , statistics , discrete mathematics , computer science , artificial intelligence , mathematical analysis , data mining
In this article, Śidák values in Table 1 and Figure 2 were reported incorrectly. In Table 1, the first column of the results (Śidák) should read as 0.738, 0.335, 0.529, 0.178, 0.327, 0.138, 0.203, 0.290. Consequently, the value in bold should be 0.879, under ‘RTP (10)’. In Figure 2, the first point (at K=1, which corresponds to Śidák) in both graphs is incorrect: power at K=1 in graph (a) should be at 0.199; expected–log(p‐value) at K=1 in graph (b) should be at 1.949. The only affected sentence in the manuscript text is in Appendix 2: ‘Interestingly, there is no monotonicity in going from K=1 (Śidák correction) to K=2,3, etc.’ (there is in fact monotonicity). Incorrect values do not affect any other discussion or conclusions of the paper.