z-logo
Premium
Nuclear magnetic resonance and magnetization study of surfactant‐coated epsilon‐Co nanoparticles
Author(s) -
Hines William,
Budnick Joseph,
Perry David,
Majetich Sara,
Booth Ryan,
Sachan Madhur
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
physica status solidi (b)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.51
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1521-3951
pISSN - 0370-1972
DOI - 10.1002/pssb.201046164
Subject(s) - superparamagnetism , magnetization , materials science , nuclear magnetic resonance , nanoparticle , magnetic anisotropy , ferromagnetic resonance , curie temperature , anisotropy , ferromagnetism , analytical chemistry (journal) , condensed matter physics , magnetocrystalline anisotropy , chemistry , magnetic field , nanotechnology , physics , optics , quantum mechanics , chromatography
A combination of 59 Co spin‐echo nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and dc magnetization measurements have been carried out on two samples of surfactant‐coated Co nanoparticles in disordered assemblies; 6.5 nm diameter ε‐Co and 12 nm diameter hcp‐Co. The ε‐Co nanoparticles exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with a blocking temperature T B  = 70 K, while the hcp‐Co nanoparticles remain ferromagnetic up to room temperature. In addition, the initial susceptibility for the ε‐Co nanoparticles can be described by the Curie–Weiss law with a negative Θ  = −158 K. The NMR signal from the hcp‐Co sample is strong at 77 K with no applied magnetic field; the spectra are straightforward and similar to that for bulk hcp Co. However, the NMR signal from the ε‐Co sample is not detectable at 77 K, even with fields up to 7.5 kOe. A NMR signal appears at 4.2 K; the echo amplitude increases dramatically with applied field. The spectra, which must be corrected for T 2 effects, are quite broad and characteristic of the small particle size. Due to the broadening, there were no observable spectral features which could be assigned to the two Co sites in crystalline ε‐Co. The results are discussed in the light of interparticle interactions which reduce the initial susceptibility and lead to negative Θ ‐values. Estimates are given for the magnetic dipolar and magnetocrystalline anisotropy energies of the particles in both samples.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here