z-logo
Premium
First‐principles calculations of the CaF 2 bulk and surface electronic structure
Author(s) -
Shi H.,
Eglitis R. I.,
Borstel G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
physica status solidi (b)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.51
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1521-3951
pISSN - 0370-1972
DOI - 10.1002/pssb.200540069
Subject(s) - hybrid functional , density functional theory , ab initio , local density approximation , electronic structure , chemistry , electronic correlation , basis set , ab initio quantum chemistry methods , band gap , electronic band structure , surface (topology) , gaussian , atomic physics , molecular physics , electron , computational chemistry , physics , condensed matter physics , quantum mechanics , molecule , geometry , mathematics , organic chemistry
We present and discuss the results of calculations of the CaF 2 bulk and surface electronic structure. These are based on the ab initio Hartree–Fock (HF) method with electron correlation corrections and on Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations with different exchange‐correlation functionals, including hybrid exchange techniques. Both approaches use the localised Gaussian‐type basis set. According to our calculations the ab initio HF method considerably overestimates (20.77 eV) the optical band gap, whereas the density functional calculations based on the Kohn–Sham equation with a number of exchange‐correlation functionals, including local density approximation (LDA) (8.72 eV), generalized gradient approximations (GGA) by Perdew and Wang (PW) (8.51 eV), and Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) (8.45 eV) underestimate it. Our results show that the best agreement with experiment (12.1 eV) can be obtained using a hybrid HF–DFT exchange functional, in which Hartree–Fock exchange is mixed with DFT exchange functionals, using Beckes three parameter method, combined with the non‐local correlation functionals by Perdew and Wang (B3PW) (10.96 eV). We also present calculations of CaF 2 (111), (110), and (100) surfaces. Our calculated surface energies using the hybrid B3PW method confirm that the CaF 2 (111) surface is the most stable one, in agreement with the experiment. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here