z-logo
Premium
Optical properties tailoring for new devices engineering in high‐gap oxides
Author(s) -
Ricci Pier Carlo,
Casu Alberto,
Salis Marcello,
Fortin Emery,
Anedda Alberto
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
physica status solidi (a)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.532
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1862-6319
pISSN - 1862-6300
DOI - 10.1002/pssa.200983752
Subject(s) - afterglow , scintillator , luminescence , materials science , band gap , dopant , optoelectronics , scintillation , impurity , doping , ion , nanotechnology , photoluminescence , engineering physics , optics , chemistry , physics , detector , gamma ray burst , organic chemistry , astronomy
Abstract Monocrystal matrices of high‐gap oxides are finding increasing applications as hosts of luminescent ions, typically rare earths (RE)s. Currently, RE‐doped oxyorthosilicates, aluminum perovskites, and garnets (RE 2 SiO 5 –REAlO 3 –RE 3 Al 5 O 12 ) are widely used as highly efficient and fast scintillators for γ‐ray detection. On the other hand, shallow or deep intragap energy levels, due to stoichiometric deviation or impurities unintentionally added in the crystals, play a counteractive role giving rise to slower scintillation decay time, reduced light yield and afterglow. The aim of this work is to show how it is possible to tailor these unwelcome outcomes and RE‐ion interactions for engineering new devices for optical memory storage. In this sense, experimental results of thermo‐ and radio‐luminescence are presented. The role of the bandgap and the location in energy of the levels due to the RE dopants and to the defects is discussed from a theoretical point of view. The feasibility in the near future of new promising transparent displays is also discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here