Premium
On the deepness of contactless electroreflectance probing in semiconductor structures
Author(s) -
Motyka M.,
Kudrawiec R.,
Misiewicz J.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
physica status solidi (a)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.532
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1862-6319
pISSN - 1862-6300
DOI - 10.1002/pssa.200673953
Subject(s) - semiconductor , penetration depth , electric field , electron , monolayer , penetration (warfare) , spectral line , materials science , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , optoelectronics , optics , nanotechnology , physics , operations research , engineering , chromatography , quantum mechanics , astronomy
The deepness of contactless electroreflectance (CER) probing ( d CER ) is investigated in this work. CER spectra have been measured for various semiconductor structures and compared with photoreflectance (PR) spectra. It has been shown that most of CER signal origins from the sample region which is very close to the sample surface. It has been found that the d CER is much smaller that the penetration depth of the probing beam ( d λ ∼ 0.5–1 μm), d CER ! d λ . In addition, for samples containing a sheet of carriers (a two dimensional electron gas at an interface or a delta‐doped monolayer) the d CER is reduced to the distance from the sample surface to the carrier sheet (e.g. 20 nm). This phenomenon can be called as screening of electromodulation in CER technique. No screening of electromodulation mechanism is observed in PR technique. In addition, the deepness of PR probing ( d PR ) is much bigger than the d CER . It means that deeper parts of semiconductor structures (e.g. the buffer layer) can be probed in PR whereas these parts are usually not probed in CER. A different electromodulation mechanism in PR and CER techniques is the origin of various probing deepness for these two techniques. In the case of CER technique, the surface electric field is mainly modulated whereas both surface and interface electric fields can be effectively modulated in the PR technique. In the case of PR technique, the electron–hole pairs can be generated far to the sample surface and hence these carriers can modulate band bending at interfaces which are far to the sample surface, e.g. at the epilayer/buffer interface. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)