Premium
Measuring migration motives with open‐ended survey data: Methodological and conceptual issues
Author(s) -
Gillespie Brian Joseph,
Mulder Clara H.,
Eggleston Casey M.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
population, space and place
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.398
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1544-8452
pISSN - 1544-8444
DOI - 10.1002/psp.2448
Subject(s) - respondent , immigration , unit (ring theory) , internal migration , conceptual framework , social psychology , psychology , sociology , data collection , public relations , political science , social science , population , law , demography , mathematics education
Motives for migration are difficult to measure. Open‐ended data collection can be an attractive option, but also comes with pitfalls. We use the “Motives for Migration” survey on internal migration in Sweden to identify some of these pitfalls. We identify five categories of methodological issues: how the respondents—and we—dealt with multiple motives for migration; who the motive pertained to (i.e., the respondents themselves or someone else in the household); whether the motive was related to a status or an event; which third‐party person(s) the respondent meant to refer to; and which geographical unit the motive pertained to. We also identify two conceptual issues: (1) the distinction between reasons for moving and location choice and (2) the distinction between moving “from” and moving “to” somewhere. We present some suggestions that will be useful for future attempts to study the topic and possibly such other topics as motives for immigration, getting married, or leaving the parental home.