Latest news and product developments

Studies suggest risk of bone loss with SSRIs Two cross‐sectional studies have suggested the SSRI antidepressants may be associated with an increased risk of bone loss ( Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1240–5 &1246–51). In 2722 older women (mean age 79) living in the community who were participating in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures cohort study, use of SSRIs was associated with a significant increase in the rate of loss of hip bone density compared with nonusers(0.82 vs 0.47 per cent per year). The rate of loss among women taking a tricyclic antidepressant was also 0.47 per cent per year. Excluding women with more severe depression did not alter the findings. In 5995 men aged 65 or older taking an SSRI in another study, mean bone density was 3.9 per cent lower at the hip and 5.9 per cent lower in the lumbar spine compared with no use of antidepressants. Use of a tricyclic antidepressant or trazodone was not associated with increased bone loss. The authors comment that the degree of bone loss is comparable with that associated with corticosteroids. Serotonin transporters have been identified in osteoblasts and osteocytes. Risk of rare birth defects with SSRIs Two US case‐control studies have found qualified evidence that use of SSRIs during the first trimester may be associated with a small increase in the risk of rare neonatal defects ( N Engl J Med 2007;356:2675–83 & 2684–92). The Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study identified 9849 infants with birth defects and 5860 without and found no significant association between SSRI use overall and defects previously attributed to SSRIs (craniosynostosis, omphalocele or heart defects). There was some evidence that sertraline and paroxetine may cause specific defects, but this was based on few cases and the absolute risk remained low. The National Birth Defects Prevention Study identified 9622 infants with major birth defects and 4092 controls. There was no significant association with heart defects but the odds of anencephaly, craniosynostosis and omphalocele were each significantly increased by a factor of 2–3. The authors say the absolute risk remains small and their findings require confirmation. UK data do not support MI link with rosiglitazone An interim analysis of a UK clinical trial of rosiglitazone (Avandia) has found no evidence that it is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction ( N Eng J Med 2007;357:28–38). A US meta‐analysis ( N Engl J Med 2007;356:2457–71) recently suggested that the odds of an MI or cardiovascular (CV) death in patients taking rosiglitazone were increased by 40–60 per cent compared with controls. The UK analysis of an ongoing nonblinded trial comparing rosiglitazone plus a sulphonylurea or metformin with sulphonylurea/metformin found no significant differences in the risk of MI or CV death. The risk of heart failure was doubled in patients taking rosiglitazone. The authors comment that, with a mean follow‐up of 3.75 years, they had too few data to reach a conclusive finding. Switch piroxicam users to another NSAID The European Medicines Agency has advised prescribers to switch patients who are taking oral piroxicam to another NSAID. The advice follows a reappraisal of the safety of piroxicam when the 2006 review of all nonselective NSAIDs suggested it may be associated with increased risks of GI adverse effects and serious skin reactions. The advice does not apply to topical formulations. Piroxicam should not be prescribed for acute conditions and should not be first‐choice for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. The maximum dose should be 20mg per day and treatment should be reviewed after 14 days. The MHRA states there is no need for urgent action; long‐term treatment should be reviewed at the next routine appointment. OTC azithromycin? The MHRA is consulting on a request by a pharmaceutical company to reschedule azithromycin to pharmacy‐only status for the treatment of known or suspected Chlamydia trachomatis infection in individuals aged 16 years or older. The applicant envisages supplies being made only when a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is positive. Responses should be submitted to the MHRA (www.mhra.gov.uk) by 2 August. Computers can reduce prescribing errors Computerised prescribing reduces by two‐thirds the rate of medication errors associated with handwritten prescriptions, a new review has found ( Health Services Research 2007; online doi:10.1111/j.1475–6773. 2007.00751.x). There was some evidence that the risk of all errors, dose errors and adverse effects were reduced by computerisation. The greatest impact was seen in settings with very high error rates (>12 per cent) associated with handwritten prescriptions. However, the studies included produced heterogeneous results and the reduction in errors in prescribing for children was not statistically significant. Furthermore, computerisation did not reduce the rate of prescribing the wrong drug. Echinacea works for colds, new study finds The herbal remedy Echinacea does reduce the risk of catching a cold, according to a new metaanalysis ( Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7:473–80). In 2006, a Cochrane review found insufficient evidence to support the benefits claimed for Echinacea. The new study, which additionally included experimentally‐induced infections among the 14 trials analysed, found that Echinacea reduced the odds of catching a cold by about half and reduced the average duration of a cold by 1.4 days. Though inconclusive, the possibility of publication bias and heterogeneity between the trials could not be excluded. HRT may reduce cardiovascular risk after all A subgroup analysis of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) suggests that HRT may reduce the risk of coronary heart disease if started soon after the menopause ( N Engl J Med 2007;356:2591–602). The main analysis of WHI showed no cardiovascular benefit for HRT, a finding attributed to the relatively old mean age of participants (59). In the new analysis of 1064 women aged 50–59, HRT use was associated with a significant reduction in coronary artery calcification compared with nonuse, with greater effect associated with greater adherence. Reducing BP key to avoiding heart failure An angiotensin–II receptor blocker (ARB) is no better than other antihypertensives at avoiding the development of heart failure in individuals with hypertension, say US investigators ( Lancet 2007;369:2079–87). Drugs that affect the renin‐angiotensin system can reduce ventricular hypertrophy and may therefore prevent the development of heart failure in patients with hypertension. This study found similar improvements in diastolic function in 384 patients with hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction randomised to valsartan (Diovan) or placebo in addition to standard antihypertensive treatment for 38 weeks. The authors conclude that blood pressure reduction, not choice of drug, is the most important factor. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Interface Ltd