Premium
Herbicide loss following application to a railway
Author(s) -
Ramwell Carmel T,
Heather Andrew IJ,
Shepherd Anthony J
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
pest management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.296
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1526-4998
pISSN - 1526-498X
DOI - 10.1002/ps.850
Subject(s) - atrazine , ditch , glyphosate , environmental science , groundwater , surface water , surface runoff , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental chemistry , pesticide , environmental engineering , agronomy , chemistry , geology , biology , ecology , geotechnical engineering
Railways have been identified as a potential source of herbicides detected in surface and groundwaters, but there are few data to support this theory. Two studies were undertaken to investigate the fate of herbicides applied to railway trackbeds: a pilot study in a section of a disused, but intact, cutting where runoff and throughflow were sampled from trenches adjacent to the treated area, and a larger scale study on 0.75 km of embankment where surface water from the drainage ditch at the base of the embankment and groundwater were sampled. In the pilot study, peak concentrations of atrazine, diuron and glyphosate (1280, 210 and 15 µg litre −1 respectively) were detected 6 days after treatment (DAT). Oxadiazon, oryzalin and isoxaben were not detected above their limits of quantification. Lower concentrations were detected 81 DAT (10 and 0.8 µg litre −1 of atrazine and glyphosate respectively). In the larger scale study, herbicides were not detected, in either the surface water or groundwater, at concentrations above the limit of detection that could be attributed to application to the railway. Rainfall volume and depth to sampling point may partly explain the different results obtained from the two studies. The findings are compared with herbicide losses from other ‘hard surfaces’. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry