Premium
The photocatalytic antibacterial molecular mechanisms towards Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci by g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets: insights from the cytomembrane, biofilm and motility disruption
Author(s) -
Cai Lin,
Jia Huanyu,
He Lanying,
Wei Xuefeng,
Feng Hui,
Fan Guangjin,
Ma Xiaozhou,
Ma Guanhua,
Sun Xianchao
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pest management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.296
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1526-4998
pISSN - 1526-498X
DOI - 10.1002/ps.6257
Subject(s) - biofilm , pseudomonas syringae , bacteria , microbiology and biotechnology , reactive oxygen species , antibacterial activity , swarming motility , photocatalysis , biology , chemistry , biochemistry , quorum sensing , genetics , catalysis
BACKGROUND Antibacterial photocatalytic therapy has been employed as a promising strategy to combat antibiotic‐resistant bacteria in the water disinfection field, especially some non‐metal inorganic nanomaterials. However, their antibacterial activities on plant phytopathogens are poorly understood. Here, the photocatalytic antibacterial mechanism of the urea‐synthesized graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets (g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets) against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci was systematically investigated in vitro and in vivo . RESULTS The g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets exhibited remarkable concentration‐dependent and irradiation‐time‐dependent antibacterial properties, and the 0.5 mg mL −1 concentration ameliorated tobacco wildfire disease in host plants. Specifically, under visible irradiation, g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets produced numerous reactive oxygen species (ROS), supplementing the plentiful extracellular and intracellular ROS in bacteria. After exposing light‐induced g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets for 1 h, 500 genes were differentially expressed, according to transcriptome analyses. Notably, the expression of genes related ‘antioxidant activity’ and ‘membrane transport’ was sharply upregulated, and those related to ‘bacterial chemotaxis’, ‘biofilm formation’, ‘energy metabolism’ and ‘cell motility’ were downregulated. After exposure for over 2 h, the longer‐time pressure on the target bacteria cause the decreased biofilm formation and flagellum motility, further injuring the cell membranes leading to cytoplasm leakage and damaged DNA, eventually resulting in the bacterial death. Concomitantly, the attachment of g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets was a synergistic physical antibacterial pathway. The infection capacity assessment also supported the earlier supposition. CONCLUSION These results provide novel insights into the photocatalytic antibacterial mechanisms of g‐C 3 N 4 nanosheets at the transcriptome level, which are expected to be useful for dissecting the response pathways in antibacterial activities and for improving g‐C 3 N 4 ‐based photocatalysts practices in plant disease control. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry