Predation interactions among henhouse‐dwelling arthropods, with a focus on the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae

BACKGROUND Analysis of the poorly explored food webs of henhouse‐dwelling arthropods would improve biological control against the poultry red mite (PRM) Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer). This study aimed to identify trophic links among native predatory arthropods, PRM, and alternative preys. In vitro predation tests were carried out to assess (i) the ability of native predators to feed on PRM juvenile and adult stages in two physiological statuses (unfed and freshly blood‐fed) in the absence of any physical barrier, (ii) predator preferences between PRM and astigmatic mites, and (iii) predation interactions between PRM predators. RESULTS Ten arthropod taxa fed on PRM with predation rates ranging from 4% to 95% in our experimental conditions. They belonged to (i) Acari: Androlaelaps casalis (Berlese), Cheyletus spp . , Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Scopoli), M. penicilliger (Berlese), Parasitus fimetorum (Berlese), Dendrolaelaps spp. and Uroobovella fimicola (Berlese); (ii) other Arachnida: Lamprochernes nodosus (Schrank) (Pseudoscorpionida) and a linyphiid spider; and (iii) Insecta: Lyctocoris campestris (Fabricius) . These predators varied in their preference for PRM stages and physiological statuses (unfed or freshly blood‐fed). When given a choice, most predators preferred to feed on PRM than astigmatic mites. Bidirectional predation occurred within two pairs of PRM predators ( M. penicilliger – Lamprochernes nodosus and A. casalis – Cheyletus spp.), and M. penicilliger had a 100% predation rate on A. casalis . CONCLUSION Our study highlights the potential of various arthropod predators occurring naturally in poultry houses for conservation and augmentative biological control of PRM. Predation interactions between these predators should be accounted for before developing biocontrol agents against PRM. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry