Premium
A new mite IPM strategy: predator avoidance behaviour resulting from the synergetic effects of predator release and acaricide‐treated nets
Author(s) -
Kungu Miriam,
Deletre Emilie,
Subramanian Sevgan,
Fiaboe Komi KM,
Gitonga Linus,
Lagat Zipporah Osiemo,
Martin Thibaud
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pest management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.296
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1526-4998
pISSN - 1526-498X
DOI - 10.1002/ps.5203
Subject(s) - acaricide , spider mite , predator , biology , mite , tetranychus urticae , toxicology , predation , spider , biological pest control , pesticide , horticulture , botany , zoology , ecology
Background Tetranychus evansi and T. urticae spider mites are known major pests of Solanaceae. Smallholders in Africa rely heavily on pesticide treatments. However, farmers claim that pesticides are generally ineffective despite high‐frequency sprays. New management solutions are thus urgently needed. This study assessed the efficacy of using acaricide‐treated nets combined with predatory mite release for controlling spider mites. Results The results showed the acaricide‐treated net alone was more effective at reducing numbers of T. urticae than T. evansi . We observed the opposite for release of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus longipes . This difference could be explained by the specific dispersion strategies of the two spider mite pests; T. evansi is gregarious, whereas T. urticae dispersed rapidly. Joint application of both techniques resulted in a synergetic effect that reduced T. evansi and T. urticae spider mite numbers close to zero. The synergetic effect could be explained by predator avoidance behaviour of the prey spider mites, resulting in higher prey trapping and killing rates on acaricide‐treated nets, while P. longipes fed on spider mite eggs. Conclusion These techniques are profitable for smallholders as they are not expensive and avoid residues on the crop. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry