z-logo
Premium
Soil dissipation and biological activity of metolachlor and S ‐metolachlor in five soils
Author(s) -
Shaner Dale L,
Brunk Galen,
Belles David,
Westra Phil,
Nissen Scott
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
pest management science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.296
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1526-4998
pISSN - 1526-498X
DOI - 10.1002/ps.1215
Subject(s) - metolachlor , pesticide , soil water , chemistry , greenhouse , agronomy , environmental science , biology , soil science , atrazine
The resolved isomer of metolachlor, S ‐metolachlor, was registered in 1997. New formulations based primarily on the S ‐metolachlor isomer are more active on a gram for gram metolachlor basis than formulations based on a racemic mixture of metolachlor containing a 50:50 ratio of the R and S isomers. The labelled use rates of S ‐metolachlor‐based products were reduced by 35% to give equivalent weed control to metolachlor. However, several companies have recently registered new metolachlor formulations with the same recommended use rates for weed control as S ‐metolachlor. This research was done to compare the soil behaviour and the biological activity of metolachlor and S ‐metolachlor in different soils under greenhouse and field conditions. Although K d ranged from 1.6 to 6.9 across the five soils, there were no differences in the binding of metolachlor and S ‐metolachlor to soil or in the rate of soil solution dissipation in a given soil. However, both greenhouse and field studies showed that S ‐metolachlor was 1.4–3‐fold more active than metolachlor against Echinochloa crus‐galli (L.) Beauv. in five different soils and that S ‐metolachlor was more active than metolachlor in three Colorado field locations. When the rates of metolachlor and S ‐metolachlor were adjusted for S isomer concentrations in the formulations, there were no differences between the formulations in field, greenhouse or bioassay studies. Thus herbicidal activity is due to the S isomers, with the R isomers being largely inactive. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here