z-logo
Premium
No reason for not learning lessons: There are many valuable resources out there!
Author(s) -
Ng Lucas,
Kiang Hong
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
process safety progress
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.378
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 1547-5913
pISSN - 1066-8527
DOI - 10.1002/prs.12121
Subject(s) - hazardous waste , process safety , risk analysis (engineering) , process (computing) , vulnerability (computing) , engineering , production (economics) , business , atmosphere (unit) , forensic engineering , environmental planning , work in process , operations management , computer security , waste management , computer science , environmental science , economics , meteorology , physics , macroeconomics , operating system
Abstract There were many wake‐up calls in past decades right from the early industrialized Europe to the present century, from the Americas and to Asia. In Asia, the most prominent process safety incident was the 1984 Bhopal accident in India that greatly impacted the chemical industry. Today, it is the prerequisite for the management of major hazards installations (MHIs) such as petroleum refining, petrochemical manufacturing facilities, and chemical processing plants to be fully aware of their responsibility to ensure meeting safety, health, and environment requirements. Any MHI failure would not only lead to operation slowdown that result in financial loss, but also to worst‐case scenarios. One typical example is hazardous material release to the atmosphere as occurred in Bhopal which can result in catastrophic consequence.We must always maintain a sense of vulnerability, learning from past incidents, adherence to code of practices, and standards for new as well as existing equipment. Such a proactive approach will definitely reduce the risk of MHI to as low as reasonably applicable.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here