Open AccessDifferential activation of G protein‐mediated signaling by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists
Author(s) -
Sachdev Shivani,
Banister Samuel D.,
Santiago Marina,
Bladen Chris,
Kassiou Michael,
Connor Mark
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pharmacology research and perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.975
H-Index - 27
ISSN - 2052-1707
DOI - 10.1002/prp2.566
Subject(s) - cannabinoid receptor , cannabinoid receptor agonists , forskolin , cannabinoid , pharmacology , potency , chemistry , stimulation , hek 293 cells , cyclic adenosine monophosphate , pertussis toxin , receptor , gi alpha subunit , g protein , medicine , endocrinology , biology , agonist , biochemistry , in vitro
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are new psychoactive substances associated with acute intoxication and even death. However, the molecular mechanisms through which SCRAs may exert their toxic effects remain unclear—including the potential differential activation of G protein subtypes by cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1), a major target of SCRA. We measured CB1‐mediated activation of Gα s and Gα i/o proteins by SCRAs by examining stimulation (pertussis toxin, PTX treated) as well as inhibition (non‐PTX treated) of forskolin (FSK)‐induced cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells stably expressing CB1. Real‐time measurements of stimulation and inhibition of cAMP levels were made using a BRET biosensor. We found that the maximum concentration of SCRAs tested (10 µmol L −1 ), increased cAMP levels 12%‐45% above that produced by FSK alone, while the phytocannabinoid THC did not significantly alter cAMP levels in PTX‐treated HEK‐CB1 cells. All SCRAs had greater potency to inhibit FSK‐induced cAMP levels than to stimulate cAMP levels. The rank order of potencies for SCRA stimulation of cAMP (Gα s ) was PB‐22 > 5F‐MDMB‐PICA > JWH‐018 ≈ AB‐FUBINACA > XLR‐11. By contrast, the potency of SCRAs for inhibition of cAMP (Gα i/o ) was 5F‐MDMB‐PICA > AB‐FUBINACA > PB‐22 > JWH‐018 > XLR‐11. The different rank order of potency and E Max of the SCRAs to stimulate Gα s ‐like signaling compared to Gα i/o signaling suggests differences in G protein preference between SCRAs. Understanding the apparent differences among these drugs may contribute to unravelling their complex effects in humans.