Open AccessSpecies differences in ocular pharmacokinetics and pharmacological activities of regorafenib and pazopanib eye‐drops among rats, rabbits and monkeys
Author(s) -
Horita Shinya,
Watanabe Miwa,
Katagiri Mai,
Nakamura Hiroaki,
Haniuda Hiroki,
Nakazato Tomoyuki,
Kagawa Yoshiyuki
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pharmacology research and perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.975
H-Index - 27
ISSN - 2052-1707
DOI - 10.1002/prp2.545
Subject(s) - regorafenib , pazopanib , medicine , macular degeneration , pharmacokinetics , pharmacology , ophthalmology , oncology , cancer , colorectal cancer , sunitinib
Abstract Age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe vision impairment in patients over the age of 60 years. Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the hallmark of neovascular AMD and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a causal role in the formation of CNV. Although regorafenib and pazopanib, small molecule VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, were developed as eye‐drops, their efficacies were insufficient in clinical. In this study, we evaluated ocular pharmacokinetics and pharmacological activities of regorafenib and pazopanib after ocular instillation in multiple animal species. In rats, both regorafenib and pazopanib showed high enough concentrations in the posterior eye tissues to inhibit VEGFR. In laser‐induced rat CNV model, regorafenib showed clear reduction in CNV area. On the other hand, the concentrations of regorafenib and pazopanib in the posterior eye tissues were much lower after ocular instillation in rabbits and monkeys compared to those in rats. Pazopanib did not show any improvement in monkey model. Regorafenib was nano‐crystalized to improve its drug delivery to the posterior eye tissues. The nano‐crystalized formulation of regorafenib showed higher concentrations in the posterior segments in rabbits compared to its microcrystal suspension. From these studies, large interspecies differences were found in ocular delivery to the posterior segments after ocular instillation. Such large interspecies difference could be the reason for the insufficient efficacies of regorafenib and pazopanib in clinical studies. Nano‐crystallization was suggested to be one of the effective ways to overcome this issue.