z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
RGS14 regulates the lifetime of G α ‐GTP signaling but does not prolong G βγ signaling following receptor activation in live cells
Author(s) -
Brown Nicole E.,
Lambert Nevin A.,
Hepler John R.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pharmacology research and perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.975
H-Index - 27
ISSN - 2052-1707
DOI - 10.1002/prp2.249
Subject(s) - g protein coupled receptor , g protein , gtpase activating protein , regulator of g protein signaling , microbiology and biotechnology , gtp binding protein regulators , gtpase , signal transduction , chemistry , gtp' , g beta gamma complex , biology , biochemistry , enzyme
RGS14 is a multifunctional scaffolding protein possessing two distinct G protein interaction sites including a regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) domain that acts as a GTPase activating protein (GAP) to deactivate G α i/o‐GTP proteins, and a G protein regulatory (GPR) motif that binds inactive G α i1/3‐GDP proteins independent of G βγ . GPR interactions with G α i recruit RGS14 to the plasma membrane to interact with G α i‐linked GPCRs and regulate G α i signaling. While RGS14 actions on G α proteins are well characterized, consequent effects on G βγ signaling remain unknown. Conventional RGS proteins act as dedicated GAPs to deactivate G α and G βγ signaling following receptor activation. RGS14 may do the same or, alternatively, may coordinate its actions to deactivate G α ‐GTP with the RGS domain and then capture the same G α ‐GDP via its GPR motif to prevent heterotrimer reassociation and prolong G βγ signaling. To test this idea, we compared the regulation of G protein activation and deactivation kinetics by a conventional RGS protein, RGS4, and RGS14 in response to GPCR agonist/antagonist treatment utilizing bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Co‐expression of either RGS4 or RGS14 inhibited the release of free G βγ after agonist stimulation and increased the deactivation rate of G α , consistent with their roles as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Overexpression of inactive G α i1 to recruit RGS14 to the plasma membrane did not alter RGS14′s capacity to act as a GAP for a second G α o protein. These results demonstrate the role of RGS14 as a dedicated GAP and suggest that the G protein regulatory (GPR) motif functions independently of the RGS domain and is silent in regulating GAP activity in a cellular context.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom