Premium
Identification of imine reductase‐specific sequence motifs
Author(s) -
Fademrecht Silvia,
Scheller Philipp N.,
Nestl Bettina M.,
Hauer Bernhard,
Pleiss Jürgen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.25008
Subject(s) - stereoselectivity , stereochemistry , imine , chemistry , sequence motif , active site , cofactor , computational biology , biochemistry , genetics , enzyme , biology , dna , catalysis
Chiral amines are valuable building blocks for the production of a variety of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals and other specialty chemicals. Only recently, imine reductases (IREDs) were discovered which catalyze the stereoselective reduction of imines to chiral amines. Although several IREDs were biochemically characterized in the last few years, knowledge of the reaction mechanism and the molecular basis of substrate specificity and stereoselectivity is limited. To gain further insights into the sequence‐function relationships, the Imine Reductase Engineering Database ( www.IRED.BioCatNet.de ) was established and a systematic analysis of 530 putative IREDs was performed. A standard numbering scheme based on R ‐IRED‐ Sk was introduced to facilitate the identification and communication of structurally equivalent positions in different proteins. A conservation analysis revealed a highly conserved cofactor binding region and a predominantly hydrophobic substrate binding cleft. Two IRED‐specific motifs were identified, the cofactor binding motif GLGxMGx 5 [ATS]x 4 Gx 4 [VIL]WNR[TS]x 2 [KR] and the active site motif Gx[DE]x[GDA]x[APS]x 3 {K}x[ASL]x[LMVIAG]. Our results indicate a preference toward NADPH for all IREDs and explain why, despite their sequence similarity to β‐hydroxyacid dehydrogenases (β‐HADs), no conversion of β‐hydroxyacids has been observed. Superfamily‐specific conservations were investigated to explore the molecular basis of their stereopreference. Based on our analysis and previous experimental results on IRED mutants, an exclusive role of standard position 187 for stereoselectivity is excluded. Alternatively, two standard positions 139 and 194 were identified which are superfamily‐specifically conserved and differ in R ‐ and S ‐selective enzymes. Proteins 2016; 84:600–610. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.