z-logo
Premium
TASSER_low‐zsc: An approach to improve structure prediction using low z ‐score–ranked templates
Author(s) -
Pandit Shashi B.,
Skolnick Jeffrey
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.22791
Subject(s) - template , threading (protein sequence) , protein structure prediction , computer science , cluster analysis , generality , benchmark (surveying) , data mining , affinity propagation , pattern recognition (psychology) , artificial intelligence , protein structure , fuzzy clustering , chemistry , psychology , biochemistry , geodesy , psychotherapist , programming language , geography , canopy clustering algorithm
In a variety of threading methods, often poorly ranked (low z ‐score) templates have good alignments. Here, a new method, TASSER_low‐zsc that identifies these low z ‐score–ranked templates to improve protein structure prediction accuracy, is described. The approach consists of clustering of threading templates by affinity propagation on the basis of structural similarity ( thread_cluster ) followed by TASSER modeling, with final models selected by using a TASSER_QA variant. To establish the generality of the approach, templates provided by two threading methods, SP 3 and SPARKS 2 , are examined. The SP 3 and SPARKS 2 benchmark datasets consist of 351 and 357 medium/hard proteins (those with moderate to poor quality templates and/or alignments) of length ≤250 residues, respectively. For SP 3 medium and hard targets, using thread_cluster , the TM‐scores of the best template improve by ∼4 and 9% over the original set (without low z ‐score templates) respectively; after TASSER modeling/refinement and ranking, the best model improves by ∼7 and 9% over the best model generated with the original template set. Moreover, TASSER_low‐zsc generates 22% (43%) more foldable medium (hard) targets. Similar improvements are observed with low‐ranked templates from SPARKS 2 . The template clustering approach could be applied to other modeling methods that utilize multiple templates to improve structure prediction. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom