Premium
Comparing the folding free‐energy landscapes of Aβ42 variants with different aggregation properties
Author(s) -
Mitternacht Simon,
Staneva Iskra,
Härd Torleif,
Irbäck Anders
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.22775
Subject(s) - folding (dsp implementation) , mutation , chemistry , amyloid fibril , amyloid (mycology) , protein folding , population , energy landscape , biophysics , biology , biochemistry , amyloid β , gene , disease , medicine , inorganic chemistry , environmental health , pathology , electrical engineering , engineering
The properties of the amyloid‐β peptide that lead to aggregation associated with Alzheimer's disease are not fully understood. This study aims at identifying conformational differences among four variants of full‐length Aβ42 that are known to display very different aggregation properties. By extensive all‐atom Monte Carlo simulations, we find that a variety of β‐sheet structures with distinct turns are readily accessible for full‐length Aβ42. In the simulations, wild type (WT) Aβ42 preferentially populates two major classes of conformations, either extended with high β‐sheet content or more compact with lower β‐sheet content. The three mutations studied alter the balance between these classes. Strong mutational effects are observed in a region centered at residues 23–26, where WT Aβ42 tends to form a turn. The aggregation‐accelerating E22G mutation associated with early onset of Alzheimer's disease makes this turn region conformationally more diverse, whereas the aggregation‐decelerating F20E mutation has the reverse effect, and the E22G/I31E mutation reduces the turn population. Comparing results for the four Aβ42 variants, we identify specific conformational properties of residues 23–26 that might play a key role in aggregation. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.