Premium
Modeling of metal interaction geometries for protein–ligand docking
Author(s) -
Seebeck Birte,
Reulecke Ingo,
Kämper Andreas,
Rarey Matthias
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.21818
Subject(s) - docking (animal) , searching the conformational space for docking , chemistry , protein data bank (rcsb pdb) , ligand (biochemistry) , protein–ligand docking , crystallography , metal , coordination geometry , protein data bank , computational chemistry , geometry , protein structure , stereochemistry , molecular dynamics , virtual screening , molecule , mathematics , hydrogen bond , biochemistry , medicine , receptor , nursing , organic chemistry
The accurate modeling of metal coordination geometries plays an important role for structure‐based drug design applied to metalloenzymes. For the development of a new metal interaction model, we perform a statistical analysis of metal interaction geometries that are relevant to protein–ligand complexes. A total of 43,061 metal sites of the Protein Data Bank (PDB), containing amongst others magnesium, calcium, zinc, iron, manganese, copper, cadmium, cobalt, and nickel, were evaluated according to their metal coordination geometry. Based on statistical analysis, we derived a model for the automatic calculation and definition of metal interaction geometries for the purpose of molecular docking analyses. It includes the identification of the metal‐coordinating ligands, the calculation of the coordination geometry and the superposition of ideal polyhedra to identify the optimal positions for free coordination sites. The new interaction model was integrated in the docking software FlexX and evaluated on a data set of 103 metalloprotein‐ligand complexes, which were extracted from the PDB. In a first step, the quality of the automatic calculation of the metal coordination geometry was analyzed. In 74% of the cases, the correct prediction of the coordination geometry could be determined on the basis of the protein structure alone. Secondly, the new metal interaction model was tested in terms of predicting protein–ligand complexes. In the majority of test cases, the new interaction model resulted in an improved docking accuracy of the top ranking placements. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.