z-logo
Premium
Functional consequences of exchanging domains between LacI and PurR are mediated by the intervening linker sequence
Author(s) -
Tungtur Sudheer,
Egan Susan M.,
SwintKruse Liskin
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.21412
Subject(s) - allosteric regulation , lac repressor , linker , effector , dna , psychological repression , biology , repressor , function (biology) , binding site , plasma protein binding , dna binding protein , transcription factor , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , genetics , computational biology , gene , gene expression , receptor , computer science , operating system
Abstract Homologue function can be differentiated by changing residues that affect binding sites or long‐range interactions. LacI and PurR are two proteins that represent the LacI/GalR family (>500 members) of bacterial transcription regulators. All members have distinct DNA‐binding and regulatory domains linked by ∼18 amino acids. Each homologue has specificity for different DNA and regulatory effector ligands; LacI and PurR also exhibit differences in allosteric communication between DNA and effector binding sites. A comparative study of LacI and PurR suggested that alterations in the interface between the regulatory domain and linker are important for differentiating their functions. Four residues (equivalent to LacI positions 48, 55, 58, and 61) appear particularly important for creating a unique interface and were predicted to be necessary for allosteric regulation. However, nearby residues in the linker interact with DNA ligand. Thus, differences observed in interactions between linker and regulatory domain may be the cause of altered function or an effect of the two proteins binding different DNA ligands. To separate these possibilities, we created a chimeric protein with the LacI DNA‐binding domain/linker and the PurR regulatory domain (LLhP). If the interface requires homologue‐specific interactions in order to propagate the signal from effector binding, then LLhP repression should not be allosterically regulated by effector binding. Experiments show that LLhP is capable of repression from lacO 1 and, contrary to expectation, allosteric response is intact. Further, restoring the potential for PurR‐like interactions via substitutions in the LLhP linker tends to diminish repression. These effects are especially pronounced for residues 58 and 61. Clearly, binding affinity of LLhP for the lacO 1 DNA site is sensitive to long‐range changes in the linker. This result also raises the possibility that mutations at positions 58 and 61 co‐evolved with changes in the DNA‐binding site. In addition, repression measured in the absence and presence of effector ligand shows that allosteric response increases for several LLhP variants with substitutions at positions 48 and 55. Thus, while side chain variation at these sites does not generally dictate the presence or absence of allostery, the nature of the amino acid can modulate the response to effector. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here