Premium
Protein‐inhibitor flexible docking by a multicanonical sampling: Native complex structure with the lowest free energy and a free‐energy barrier distinguishing the native complex from the others
Author(s) -
Kamiya Narutoshi,
Yonezawa Yasushige,
Nakamura Haruki,
Higo Junichi
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.21409
Subject(s) - molecular dynamics , chemistry , docking (animal) , native state , crystallography , maxima and minima , molecule , energy landscape , chemical physics , lysozyme , protein structure , cluster (spacecraft) , computational chemistry , computer science , medicine , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , nursing , mathematics , organic chemistry , programming language
Flexible docking between a protein (lysozyme) and an inhibitor (tri‐ N ‐acetyl‐ D ‐glucosamine, tri‐NAG) was carried out by an enhanced conformational sampling method, multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation. We used a flexible all‐atom model to express lysozyme, tri‐NAG, and water molecules surrounding the two bio‐molecules. The advantages of this sampling method are as follows: the conformation of system is widely sampled without trapping at energy minima, a thermally equilibrated conformational ensemble at an arbitrary temperature can be reconstructed from the simulation trajectory, and the thermodynamic weight can be assigned to each sampled conformation. During the simulation, exchanges between the binding and free (i.e., unbinding) states of the protein and the inhibitor were repeatedly observed. The conformational ensemble reconstructed at 300 K involved various conformational clusters. The main outcome of the current study is that the most populated conformational cluster (i.e., the cluster of the lowest free energy) was assigned to the native complex structure (i.e., the X‐ray complex structure). The simulation also produced non‐native complex structures, where the protein and the inhibitor bound with different modes from that of the native complex structure, as well as the unbinding structures. A free‐energy barrier (i.e., activation free energy) was clearly detected between the native complex structures and the other structures. The thermal fluctuations of tri‐NAG in the lowest free‐energy complex correlated well with the X‐ray B‐factors of tri‐NAG in the X‐ray complex structure. The existence of the free‐energy barrier ensures that the lowest free‐energy structure can be discriminated naturally from the other structures. In other words, the multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation can predict the native complex structure without any empirical objective function. The current study also manifested that the flexible all‐atom model and the physico‐chemically defined atomic‐level force field can reproduce the native complex structure. A drawback of the current method is that it requires a time consuming computation due to the exhaustive conformational sampling. We discussed a possibility for combining the current method with conventional docking methods. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.