Premium
Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP‐protein binding: A new criterion to rank docking solutions
Author(s) -
Pyrkov Timothy V.,
Kosinsky Yuri A.,
Arseniev Alexander S.,
Priestle John P.,
Jacoby Edgar,
Efremov Roman G.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.21122
Subject(s) - docking (animal) , searching the conformational space for docking , stacking , protein–ligand docking , chemistry , hydrogen bond , hydrophobic effect , macromolecular docking , molecular recognition , computational biology , binding site , molecular dynamics , computational chemistry , molecule , virtual screening , biochemistry , biology , medicine , nursing , organic chemistry
ATP is an important substrate of numerous biochemical reactions in living cells. Molecular recognition of this ligand by proteins is very important for understanding enzymatic mechanisms. Considerable insight into the problem may be gained via molecular docking simulations. At the same time, standard docking protocols are often insufficient to predict correct conformations for protein–ATP complexes. Thus, in most cases the native‐like solutions can be found among the docking poses, but current scoring functions have only limited ability to discriminate them from false positives. To improve the selection of correct docking solutions obtained with the GOLD software, we developed a new ranking criterion specific for ATP–protein binding. The method is based on detailed analysis of the intermolecular interactions in 40 high‐resolution 3D structures of ATP–protein complexes (the training set). We found that the most important factors governing this recognition are hydrogen‐bonding, stacking between adenine and aromatic protein residues, and hydrophobic contacts between adenine and protein residues. To address the latter, we applied the formalism of 3D molecular hydrophobicity potential. The results obtained were used to construct an ATP‐oriented scoring criterion as a linear combination of the terms describing these intermolecular interactions. The criterion was then validated using the test set of 10 additional ATP–protein complexes. As compared with the standard scoring functions, the new ranking criterion significantly improved the selection of correct docking solutions in both sets and allowed considerable enrichment at the top of the list containing docking poses with correct solutions. Proteins 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.