Premium
Electrostatic contribution to the binding stability of protein–protein complexes
Author(s) -
Dong Feng,
Zhou HuanXiang
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.21070
Subject(s) - van der waals force , dielectric , electrostatics , chemistry , chemical physics , static electricity , solvent models , polar , computational chemistry , solvation , crystallography , solvent , molecule , physics , quantum mechanics , organic chemistry
To investigate roles of electrostatic interactions in protein binding stability, electrostatic calculations were carried out on a set of 64 mutations over six protein–protein complexes. These mutations alter polar interactions across the interface and were selected for putative dominance of electrostatic contributions to the binding stability. Three protocols of implementing the Poisson‐Boltzmann model were tested. In vdW4 the dielectric boundary between the protein low dielectric and the solvent high dielectric is defined as the protein van der Waals surface and the protein dielectric constant is set to 4. In SE4 and SE20, the dielectric boundary is defined as the surface of the protein interior inaccessible to a 1.4‐Å solvent probe, and the protein dielectric constant is set to 4 and 20, respectively. In line with earlier studies on the barnase–barstar complex, the vdW4 results on the large set of mutations showed the closest agreement with experimental data. The agreement between vdW4 and experiment supports the contention of dominant electrostatic contributions for the mutations, but their differences also suggest van der Waals and hydrophobic contributions. The results presented here will serve as a guide for future refinement in electrostatic calculation and inclusion of nonelectrostatic effects. Proteins 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.