Premium
BATMAS30: Amino acid substitution matrix for alignment of bacterial transporters
Author(s) -
Sutormin Roman A.,
Rakhmaninova Aleksandra B.,
Gelfand Mikhail S.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.10308
Subject(s) - transmembrane protein , amino acid , transmembrane domain , tyrosine , aromatic amino acids , peptide sequence , biochemistry , membrane protein , chemistry , biology , stereochemistry , membrane , gene , receptor
Aligned amino acid sequences of three functionally independent samples of transmembrane (TM) transport proteins have been analyzed. The concept of TM‐kernel is proposed as the most probable transmembrane region of a sequence. The average amino acid composition of TM‐kernels differs from the published amino acid composition of transmembrane segments. TM‐kernels contain more alanines, glycines, and less polar, charged, and aromatic residues in contrast to non‐TM‐proteins. There are also differences between TM‐kernels of bacterial and eukaryotic proteins. We have constructed amino acid substitution matrices for bacterial TM‐kernels, named the BATMAS (BActerial Transmembrane MAtrix of Substitutions) series. In TM‐kernels, polar and charged residues, as well as proline and tyrosine, are highly conserved, whereas there are more substitutions within the group of hydrophobic residues, in contrast to non‐TM‐proteins that have fewer, relatively more conserved, hydrophobic residues. These results demonstrate that alignment of transmembrane proteins should be based on at least two amino acid substitution matrices, one for loops (e.g., the BLOSUM series) and one for TM‐segments (the BATMAS series), and the choice of the TM‐matrix should be different for eukaryotic and bacterial proteins. Proteins 2003;51:85–95. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.