Premium
Molecular dynamics simulations of a double unit cell in a protein crystal: Volume relaxation at constant pressure and correlation of motions between the two unit cells
Author(s) -
Walser Regula,
Hünenberger Philippe H.,
van Gunsteren Wilfred F.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/prot.10143
Subject(s) - molecular dynamics , constant (computer programming) , unit (ring theory) , chemistry , molecular physics , chemical physics , crystallography , computational chemistry , mathematics , mathematics education , computer science , programming language
Eight molecular dynamics simulations of a double crystal unit cell of ubiquitin were performed to investigate the effects of simulating at constant pressure and of simulating two unit cells compared to a single unit cell. To examine the influence of different simulation conditions, the constant‐pressure and constant‐volume simulations were each performed with and without counterions and using two different treatments of the long‐range electrostatic interactions (lattice‐sum and reaction‐field methods). The constant‐pressure simulations were analyzed in terms of unit cell deformation and accompanying protein deformations. Energetic and structural properties of the proteins in the simulations of the double unit cell were compared to the results of previously reported one‐unit‐cell simulations. Correlation between the two unit cells was also investigated based on relative translational and rotational movements of the proteins and on dipole fluctuations. The box in the constant‐pressure simulations is found to deform slowly to reach convergence only after 5–10 ns. This deformation does not result from a distortion in the structure of the proteins but rather from changes in protein packing within the unit cell. The results of the double‐unit‐cell simulations are closely similar to the results of the single‐unit‐cell simulations, and little motional correlation is found between the two unit cells. Proteins 2002;48:327–340. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.