Premium
Transurethral microwave hyperthermia: An alternative treatment for prostadynia?
Author(s) -
Baert L.,
Willemen P.,
Ameye F.,
Astrahan M.,
Langholz B.,
Pétrovich Z.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
the prostate
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.295
H-Index - 123
eISSN - 1097-0045
pISSN - 0270-4137
DOI - 10.1002/pros.2990190204
Subject(s) - dysuria , medicine , nocturia , urination , hyperthermia , refractory (planetary science) , symptom relief , urology , lower urinary tract symptoms , anesthesia , surgery , prostate , urinary system , physics , cancer , astrobiology
A total of 15 patients with severe symptoms of prostadynia who were refractory to therapy were treated with transurethral microwave hyperthermia (TUHT) in a phase I trial. All patients had pain as the predominant symptom, 9 (60%) patients gave a history of psychological problems while frequency, urgency, dysuria, nocturia, and impotence were less common symptoms. Treatment consisted of TUHT at 915 MHz given weekly for 5 weeks with a total of 68 treatment sessions and a mean of 4.5 treatments per patient. Each treatment lasted for 60 minutes. The aim was to increase the temperature measured on the urethral surface to ≧44°C. T mean for all sessions was 45.5°C. In 91% of treatments, the temperature was ≧44°C. Treatment was well tolerated in 87% patients and acute toxicity was mild. Of the 15 patients treated, 2 (13%) did not complete the treatment course due to discomfort during TUHT. Good treatment response, manifested by complete pain relief and a decrease in dysuria, was noted in 7 (47%) patients. A higher (≧ 467°C) treatment temperature correlated well with good response, P < .01. Similarly, relief of pain correlated well with the absence of a history of psychological problems, P < .01. A decrease of obstructive micturition problems was noted in 5 of the 7 patients who had this upon presentation. This study showed evidence of therapeutic activity with the use of TUHT in patients with prostadynia refractory to therapy. The response obtained was limited to less than one‐half of the patients. Complete pain relief was obtained in 4 (27%) patients. It is of interest to note that patients who had major benefit did not show evidence of psychological problems and were able to tolerate higher treatment temperatures. The latter could suggest a temperature‐related response.