Premium
The effect of lymph node dissection on cancer‐specific survival in salvage radical prostatectomy patients
Author(s) -
Wenzel Mike,
Würnschimmel Christoph,
Nocera Luigi,
Collà Ruvolo Claudia,
Tian Zhe,
Shariat Shahrokh F.,
Saad Fred,
Briganti Alberto,
Graefen Markus,
Kluth Luis A.,
Mandel Philipp,
Chun Felix K. H.,
Karakiewicz Pierre I.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the prostate
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.295
H-Index - 123
eISSN - 1097-0045
pISSN - 0270-4137
DOI - 10.1002/pros.24112
Subject(s) - prostatectomy , medicine , prostate cancer , lymph node , urology , biochemical recurrence , prostate specific antigen , dissection (medical) , lymphadenectomy , salvage therapy , hazard ratio , stage (stratigraphy) , surgery , oncology , cancer , chemotherapy , confidence interval , paleontology , biology
Abstract Background We hypothesized that lymph node dissection (LND) at salvage radical prostatectomy may be associated with lower cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) and we tested this hypothesis. Methods We relied on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (2004–2016) to identify all salvage radical prostatectomy patients. Categorical, as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression models tested the effect of LND (LND performed vs. not), as well as at its extent (log‐transformed lymph node count) on CSM. Results Of 427 salvage radical prostatectomy patients, 120 (28.1%) underwent LND with a median lymph node count of 6 (interquartile range [IQR], 3–11). According to LND status, no significant or clinically meaningful differences were recorded in PSA at diagnosis, stage and biopsy Gleason score at diagnosis, except for age at prostate cancer diagnosis (LND performed 63 vs. 68 years LND not performed, p < .001). LND status (performed) was an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; p = .03). Similarly, lymph node count (log transformed) also independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.60; p = .01). After the 7th removed lymph node, the effect of CSM became marginal. The effect of N‐stage on CSM could not be tested due to insufficient number of observations. Conclusions Salvage radical prostatectomy is rarely performed and LND at salvage radical prostatectomy is performed in a minority of patients. However, LND at salvage radical prostatectomy is associated with lower CSM. Moreover, LND extent also exerts a protective effect on CSM. These observations should be considered in salvage radical prostatectomy candidates.