Premium
MgATP binding to the nucleotide‐binding domains of the eukaryotic cytoplasmic chaperonin induces conformational changes in the putative substrate‐binding domains
Author(s) -
Szpikowska Barbara K.,
Sherman Mark A.,
Mas Maria T.,
Swiderek Kristine M.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1002/pro.5560070705
Subject(s) - chaperonin , groel , nucleotide , biochemistry , conformational change , cytosol , biophysics , chemistry , adenosine triphosphate , protein subunit , proteolysis , protein structure , biology , protein folding , enzyme , escherichia coli , gene
The eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonins are large heterooligomeric complexes with a cylindrical shape, resembling that of the homooligomeric bacterial counterpart, GroEL. In analogy to GroEL, changes in shape of the cytosolic chaperonin have been detected in the presence of MgATP using electron microscopy but, in contrast to the nucleotide‐induced conformational changes in GroEL, no details are available about the specific nature of these changes. The present study identifies the structural regions of the cytosolic chaperonin that undergo conformational changes when MgATP binds to the nucleotide binding domains. It is shown that limited proteolysis with trypsin in the absence of MgATP cleaves each of the eight subunits approximately in half, generating two fragments of ∼ 30 kDa. Using mass spectrometry (MS) and N‐terminal sequence analysis, the cleavage is found to occur in a narrow span of the amino acid sequence, corresponding to the peptide binding regions of GroEL and to the helical protrusion, recently identified in the structure of the substrate binding domain of the archeal group I1 chaperonin. This proteolytic cleavage is prevented by MgATP but not by ATP in the absence of magnesium, ATP analogs (MgATPyS and MgAMP‐PNP) or MgADP. These results suggest that, in analogy to GroEL, binding of MgATP to the nucleotide binding domains of the cytosolic chaperonin induces long range conformational changes in the polypeptide binding domains. It is postulated that despite their different subunit composition and substrate specificity, group I and group I1 chaperonins may share similar, functionally‐important, conformational changes. Additional conformational changes are likely to involve a flexible helix‐loop‐helix motif, which is characteristic for all group II chaperonins.