z-logo
Premium
Oligomerization properties of GCN4 leucine zipper e and g position mutants
Author(s) -
Zeng Xiangang,
Zhu Hai,
Lashel Hilal A.,
Hu James C.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1002/pro.5560061016
Subject(s) - mutant , leucine zipper , dimer , zipper , tetramer , alanine , amino acid , chemistry , lysine , biophysics , peptide sequence , biochemistry , biology , gene , enzyme , organic chemistry , algorithm , computer science
Abstract Putative intersubunit electrostatic interactions between charged amino acids on the surfaces of the dimer interfaces of leucine zippers ( g‐e ' ion pairs) have been implicated as determinants of dimerization specificity. To evaluate the importance of these ionic interactions in determining the specificity of dimer formation, we constructed a pool of >65,000 GCN4 leucine zipper mutants in which all the e and g positions are occupied by different combinations of alanine, glutamic acid, lysine, or threonine. The oligomerization properties of these mutants were evaluated based on the phenotypes of cells expressing λ repressor‐leucine zipper fusion proteins. About 90% of the mutants do not form stable homooligomers. Surprisingly, approximately 8% of the mutant sequences have phenotypes consistent with the formation of higher‐order (>dimer) oligomers, which can be classified into three types based on sequence features. The oligomerization states of mutants from two of these types were determined by characterizing purified fusion proteins. The Type I mutant behaved as a tetramer under all tested conditions, whereas the Type III mutant formed a variety of higher‐order oligomers, depending on the solution conditions. Stable homodimers comprise less than 3% of the pool; several g‐e ' positions in these mutants could form attractive ion pairs. Putative repulsive ion pairs are not found among the homodimeric mutants. However, patterns of charged residues at the e and g positions do not seem to be sufficient to predict either homodimer or heterodimer formation among the mutants.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here