Premium
A stable intermediate in the thermal unfolding process of a chimeric 3‐isopropylmalate dehydrogenase between a thermophilic and a mesophilic enzymes
Author(s) -
HayashiIwasaki Yoko,
Numata Koichi,
Yamagishi Akihiko,
Yutani Katsuhide,
Sakurai Masahiro,
Tanaka Nobuo,
Oshima Tairo
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1002/pro.5560050313
Subject(s) - thermus thermophilus , thermophile , crystallography , thermostability , differential scanning calorimetry , chemistry , enzyme , dehydrogenase , thermus , biochemistry , escherichia coli , thermodynamics , physics , gene
The thermal unfolding process of a chimeric 3‐isopropylmalate dehydrogenase made of parts from an extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus , and a mesophile, Bacillus subtilis , enzymes was studied by CD spectrophotometry and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The enzyme is a homodimer with a subunit containing two structural domains. The DSC melting profile of the chimeric enzyme in 20 mM NaHCO 3 , pH 10.4, showed two endothermic peaks, whereas that of the T. thermophilus wild‐type enzyme had one peak. The CD melting profiles of the chimeric enzyme under the same conditions as the DSC measurement, also indicated biphasic unfolding transition. Concentration dependence of the unfolding profile revealed that the first phase was protein concentration‐independent, whereas the second transition was protein concentration‐dependent. When cooled after the first transition, the intermediate was isolated, which showed only the second transition upon heating. These results indicated the existence of a stable dimeric intermediate followed by the further unfolding and dissociation in the thermal unfolding of the chimeric enzyme at pH 10–11. Because the portion derived from the mesophilic isopropylmalate dehydrogenase in the chimeric enzyme is located in the hinge region between two domains of the enzyme, it is probably responsible for weakening of the interdomain interaction and causing the decooperativity of two domains. The dimeric form of the intermediate suggested that the first unfolding transition corresponds to the unfolding of domain 1 containing the N‐ and C‐termini of the enzyme, and the second to that of domain 2 containing the subunit interface.