Premium
Measuring gas vesicle dimensions by electron microscopy
Author(s) -
Dutka Przemysław,
Malounda Dina,
Metskas Lauren Ann,
Chen Songye,
Hurt Robert C.,
Lu George J.,
Jensen Grant J.,
Shapiro Mikhail G.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1002/pro.4056
Subject(s) - electron microscope , buoyancy , vesicle , chemistry , microscopy , biological system , biophysics , nanotechnology , materials science , analytical chemistry (journal) , physics , biology , optics , chromatography , mechanics , biochemistry , membrane
Gas vesicles (GVs) are cylindrical or spindle‐shaped protein nanostructures filled with air and used for flotation by various cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, and Archaea. Recently, GVs have gained interest in biotechnology applications due to their ability to serve as imaging agents and actuators for ultrasound, magnetic resonance and several optical techniques. The diameter of GVs is a crucial parameter contributing to their mechanical stability, buoyancy function and evolution in host cells, as well as their properties in imaging applications. Despite its importance, reported diameters for the same types of GV differ depending on the method used for its assessment. Here, we provide an explanation for these discrepancies and utilize electron microscopy (EM) techniques to accurately estimate the diameter of the most commonly studied types of GVs. We show that during air drying on the EM grid, GVs flatten, leading to a ~1.5‐fold increase in their apparent diameter. We demonstrate that GVs' diameter can be accurately determined by direct measurements from cryo‐EM samples or alternatively indirectly derived from widths of flat collapsed and negatively stained GVs. Our findings help explain the inconsistency in previously reported data and provide accurate methods to measure GVs dimensions.