Premium
Engineered variants of InlB with an additional leucine‐rich repeat discriminate between physiologically relevant and packing contacts in crystal structures of the InlB:MET complex
Author(s) -
Niemann Hartmut H.,
Gherardi Ermanno,
Bleymüller Willem M.,
Heinz Dirk W.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
protein science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.353
H-Index - 175
eISSN - 1469-896X
pISSN - 0961-8368
DOI - 10.1002/pro.2142
Subject(s) - leucine rich repeat , ectodomain , receptor tyrosine kinase , hek 293 cells , protein kinase domain , gene isoform , chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , computational biology , biophysics , receptor , biochemistry , signal transduction , kinase , gene , mutant
The physiological relevance of contacts in crystal lattices often remains elusive. This was also the case for the complex between the invasion protein internalin B (InlB) from Listeria monocytogenes and its host cell receptor, the human receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) MET. InlB is a MET agonist and induces bacterial host cell invasion. Activation of RTKs generally involves ligand‐induced dimerization of the receptor ectodomain. The two currently available crystal structures of the InlB:MET complex show the same arrangement of InlB and MET in a 1:1 complex, but different dimeric 2:2 assemblies. Only one of these 2:2 assemblies is predicted to be stable by a computational procedure. This assembly is mainly stabilized by a contact between the Cap domain of InlB from one and the Sema domain of MET from another 1:1 complex. Here, we probe the physiological relevance of this interaction. We generated variants of the leucine‐rich repeat (LRR) protein InlB by inserting an additional repeat between the first and the second LRR. This should allow formation of the 1:1 complex but disrupt the potential 2:2 complex involving the Cap‐Sema contact due to steric distortions. A crystal structure of one of the engineered proteins showed that it folded properly. Binding affinity to MET was comparable to that of wild‐type InlB. The InlB variant induced MET phosphorylation and cell scatter like wild‐type InlB. These results suggest that the Cap‐Sema interaction is not physiologically relevant and support the previously proposed assembly, in which a 2:2 InlB:MET complex is built around a ligand dimer.