Premium
Using the diagnostic thinking inventory in musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a validity and reliability study
Author(s) -
Hamzeh Hayat,
Madi Mohammad,
Hensman Marianne
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
physiotherapy research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.509
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1471-2865
pISSN - 1358-2267
DOI - 10.1002/pri.1895
Subject(s) - intraclass correlation , cronbach's alpha , physical therapy , context (archaeology) , reliability (semiconductor) , medicine , construct validity , test (biology) , psychology , physical medicine and rehabilitation , psychometrics , clinical psychology , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
Background Development of clinical reasoning is an essential aspect in musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice that is linked to better outcomes. The measurement of clinical reasoning has placed an emphasis on diagnostic reasoning using different types of examinations. The Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI) is a self‐assessment tool developed to measure two aspects of diagnostic reasoning: flexibility in thinking (FT) and structure in memory (SM). DTI is valid and reliable that has been used extensively in medical field. Objective To investigate the validity and reliability of DTI in musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice. Methods Two groups of musculoskeletal physiotherapists completed DTI. Expert musculoskeletal physiotherapists assessed face and content validity. Data from the second group of musculoskeletal physiotherapists were used to assess test–retest reliability. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed by comparing both groups. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS statistics 25.0 version. Results The experts agreed that DTI measures diagnostic reasoning. For test–retest reliability, average intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91, 0.92 and 0.90 ( p < 0.001) for DTI, FT and SM scores, respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.909, 0.919 and 0.897 ( p < 0.001) for DTI, FT and SM, respectively. The independent samples t ‐test demonstrated that the experts group achieved higher and statistically significant score ( p < 0.001). Conclusion DTI is valid and reliable in measuring diagnostic reasoning in the context of musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice. It can be used to assess the impact of continuing education on musculoskeletal physiotherapists' diagnostic reasoning.