Premium
Reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry in persons with conservatively managed wrist fractures
Author(s) -
Sæbø Humaira,
Naterstad Ingvill Fjell,
Stausholm Martin Bjørn,
Bjordal Jan Magnus,
Joensen Jon
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
physiotherapy research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.509
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1471-2865
pISSN - 1358-2267
DOI - 10.1002/pri.1797
Subject(s) - inter rater reliability , wrist , intraclass correlation , intra rater reliability , medicine , reliability (semiconductor) , physical therapy , wrist pain , standard error , orthodontics , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , psychology , confidence interval , psychometrics , mathematics , clinical psychology , developmental psychology , rating scale , power (physics) , physics , statistics , quantum mechanics
Objective Wrist fracture is a common injury in Norway. Pressure algometry is widely used to quantify patients' pain threshold in various anatomical locations. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability of pain pressure threshold (PPT) algometry in persons with conservatively managed distal radius fractures. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, three raters (A, B, and C) tested the PPT of participants (18–97 years of age) with a unilateral distal radius fracture after removal of the cast. The raters conducted two measurements of both wrists. Intrarater reliability was examined in 75, 50, and 25 participants by Raters A, B, and C, respectively. Interrater reliability was tested in 50 and 25 participants by Rater Pairs A–B and A–C, respectively. Relative reliability was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 1.1 ) and absolute reliability using within‐subject standard deviation ( S w ). Results There was a significant difference in the PPT between the participants' injured and noninjured wrists ( p < .0001). The mean PPT was 29% lower in the injured than in the noninjured wrists, 175 kPa ( SD ± 62) versus 248 kPa ( SD ± 83). Intrarater reliability (A) of PPT algometry was better in injured wrists than in noninjured wrists (ICC 1.1 = 0.825 vs. 0.765 and S w = 27 vs. 43 kPa). Similarly, interrater reliability of PPT algometry was better in injured wrists than in noninjured wrists. In injured wrists, the interrater reliability of PPT algometry between Raters A and B was 0.617 (ICC 1.1 ) and S w was 51 kPa, and between Raters A and C, the interrater reliability was 0.706 (ICC 1.1 ) and S w was 48 kPa. Conclusion PPT algometry is a useful measurement tool with acceptable reliability and thus suitable for monitoring and quantifying pain in persons with conservatively managed wrist fractures. To be more certain that a change has occurred, the same rater should perform the measurements.