Premium
Assessment of Stability of Propellants and Safe Lifetimes
Author(s) -
de Klerk Wim P. C.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.56
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1521-4087
pISSN - 0721-3115
DOI - 10.1002/prep.201500040
Subject(s) - propellant , stabilizer (aeronautics) , explosive material , forensic engineering , nuclear engineering , materials science , aerospace engineering , mechanics , engineering , chemistry , physics , organic chemistry
The surveillance of gun propellants is basically performed either by an investigation into the thermal behavior of the propellant or by the determination of its remaining effective stabilizer content. Over the years it is shown that the surveillance of NC based gun propellants is necessary. NC based materials are intrinsically unstable, and can cause many accidents. Some accidents were caused by old unstable material, other ones were initiated by the extreme conditions during storage, like during expeditionary operations of military forces. And in quite a few cases it was a combination of these. Surveillance tests have changed over the years, and the last philosophy is to test the propellants as close as possible in comparison to the way they are stored [1] for this way of testing the Heat Flow Calorimetry (or microcalorimetry) method is the optimum. Older methods like the Abel heat test, Methyl Violet Test, Bergman‐Junk stability test, are test methods an analysis of the current status, without or very limited prediction behavior. Besides that the temperatures are relatively high, the measuring value is quite strongly dependent of the observer/operator. In general these tests are applied for propellants and sometimes explosives, although the general application worldwide (as far they are in use by countries) is propellants.