z-logo
Premium
An Ab Initio Theoretical Study of 2,4,6‐Trinitro‐1,3,5‐Triazine, 3,6‐Dinitro‐1,2,4,5‐Tetrazine, and 2,5,8‐Trinitro‐Tri‐s‐Triazine
Author(s) -
Li Jinshan
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.56
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1521-4087
pISSN - 0721-3115
DOI - 10.1002/prep.200700208
Subject(s) - isodesmic reaction , tetrazine , chemistry , triazine , standard enthalpy of formation , computational chemistry , basis set , detonation , density functional theory , ab initio , detonation velocity , explosive material , organic chemistry
In order to evaluate 2,4,6‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazine (TNTAz), 3,6‐dinitro‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (DNTAz), and 2,5,8‐trinitro‐tri‐s‐triazine (TNTsTAz), the geometries of these compounds have been fully optimized employing the B3LYP density functional method and the AUG‐cc‐pVDZ basis set. The accurate gas phase enthalpies of formation have been obtained by using the atomization procedure and designing isodesmic reactions in which the parent rings are not destroyed. Based on B3LYP/AUG‐cc‐pVDZ calculated geometries and natural charges, the crystal structures have been predicted using the Karfunkel–Gdanitz method. Computed results show that there exists extended conjugation over the parent rings of these compounds. More energy content is reserved in DNTAz than in both TNTAz and TNTsTAz. The title compounds are much more sensitive than 1,3,5‐trinitrobenzene. The calculated detonation velocity of DNTAz reaches 9.73–9.88 km s −1 , being larger than those of CL‐20 and TNTAz. TNTsTAz has no advantage over the widely used energetic compounds such as RDX and HMX.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here