Premium
Numerical calibration of donor systems for some GAP tests
Author(s) -
Hudson Lewis C.,
Bernecker Richard R.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.56
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1521-4087
pISSN - 0721-3115
DOI - 10.1002/prep.19950200609
Subject(s) - mechanics , attenuator (electronics) , cylinder , materials science , mathematics , physics , geometry , optics , attenuation
Abstract Numerical models of various donor/attenuator systems utilized in gap tests were evaluated with the DYNA2D hydrocode. Three donor (pressed pentolite)/attenuator (PMMA) configurations were tested. Case I and Case 2 had a pentolite donor which was 2 cm × 2 cm right cylinder; the cell size was smaller in Case 1. Case 3 utilized a composite pentolite donor 2.07 cm long but having stepped diameters of one and two cm; the cell size was quite similar to that of Case 2. Peak (axial) pressure versus distance results from Case 1 were scaled and Compared to experimental data for both the NOL large scale gap test (LSGT) and the NSWC expanded large scale gap test (ELSGT). The comparison was found to be very good for the LSGT but less satisfactory for the ELSGT. Peak (axial) pressure versus distance results from Case 1 were the also compared to Case 2, a coarser zoned model similar to Case 1, and Case 3. This comparison showed that the composite donor produced peak (axial) pressures similar to those from the LSGT model. Normalized peak pressure versus radial distance and shock profiles were compared for the three cases and found to be quite similar. Additional normalized peak pressure versus radial distance and normalized pressure versus time information from Case 1 is plotted to show how the pentolite/PMMA rarefaction affects both the axial and radial pressure‐time histories.