Stationary Phase 5. Evaluation of Stationary Phases for HPLC of Explosives | Zendy

Den T. G. | Zendy; Ho K. C. | Zendy; Lee C. H. | Zendy; Wang C. B. | Zendy; Chang T. C. | Zendy; Chen Y. Z. | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Stationary Phase 5. Evaluation of Stationary Phases for HPLC of Explosives

Author(s) -

Den T. G.,

Ho K. C.,

Lee C. H.,

Wang C. B.,

Chang T. C.,

Chen Y. Z.

Publication year - 1987

Publication title -

propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.56

H-Index - 65

eISSN - 1521-4087

pISSN - 0721-3115

DOI - 10.1002/prep.19870120106

Subject(s) - explosive material , dichloromethane , phase (matter) , stationary phase , hexane , methanol , chromatography , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , materials science , solvent , organic chemistry

The retentions of 11 explosives on two commercially RP‐18 and Si 100 stationary phases and one prepared 3‐[9′‐(10′‐methylanthryl)]‐ propylsilane stationary phase (MAPS‐phase) were examined by modified mobile phases. The evaluation of these three stationary phases results as follows: (1) Most explosives were effectively separated on a column of MAPS‐phase not only with methanol/water (75/25‐85/15) as mobile phase but also with n‐hexane/dichloromethane (75/25) as mobile phase. (2) Few explosives were effectively separated on a column of RP‐18 with methanol/water (75/25‐85/15) as mobile phase. (3) The separation of most explosives on Si 100 was achieved only under normal phase condition such as n‐hexane/dichloromethane (75/25) as mobile phase.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research