z-logo
Premium
Information practice, responsibility, and the ability to respond
Author(s) -
Kaczmarek Michelle,
Shankar Saguna,
Nathan Lisa P.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
proceedings of the association for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.193
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 2373-9231
DOI - 10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501138
Subject(s) - stewardship (theology) , relation (database) , scholarship , public relations , injustice , rhetoric , focus (optics) , generative grammar , engineering ethics , position (finance) , moral responsibility , political science , sociology , business , computer science , law , engineering , politics , linguistics , philosophy , physics , optics , finance , database , artificial intelligence
In situations when digital systems exacerbate bias and injustice, who should be held responsible? Who is in a position to respond effectively? This poster 1) critiques dominant rhetoric concerning responsibility and the ability to respond to the influence of digital information systems; 2) argues for the field of information science to contribute to this discussion beyond a focus on policy; and 3) calls for information scientists to draw upon and extend information practice scholarship by applying it as a generative lens for conceptualizing responsibility in relation to ethical data stewardship.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom