Premium
Impact of COVID‐19 on pediatric pulmonology healthcare practice
Author(s) -
Nayir Buyuksahin Halime,
Emiralioglu Nagehan,
Ademhan Tural Dilber,
Ozsezen Beste,
Sunman Birce,
Guzelkas Ismail,
Yalcin Ebru,
Dogru Deniz,
Ozcelik Ugur,
Kiper Nural
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.25557
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonology , spirometry , pandemic , covid-19 , emergency medicine , observational study , spirometer , outpatient clinic , dlco , pediatrics , lung , lung function , disease , asthma , diffusing capacity , exhaled nitric oxide , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) is typically spread by droplets and has had a remarkable effect on pediatric pulmonology healthcare practice. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the clinical follow‐up and hospital visits of patients followed up at a pediatric pulmonology unit at a tertiary care center. Methods This study was an observational descriptive study performed at a tertiary care center pediatric pulmonology unit between January 2019 and December 2020. We analyzed the outpatient visits, laboratory procedures which including pulmonary function tests (PFTs), diffusion capacity assessment, plethysmography, and lung clearance index (LCI), high‐speed video microscopy, gastric aspirate sampling, and Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) during clinical follow‐up, and hospitalization numbers of patients with chronic lung diseases during the COVID‐19 pandemic and compared them with the previous year before the pandemic started. Results In 2020, compared with 2019, outpatient visits decreased by 42.2%; from 8324 patients to 4804 patients and other laboratory procedures decreased after the pandemic started; PFTs including spirometry by 87.2%; from 2990 to 380 tests, diffusion capacity assessment from 172 to 55 tests, plethysmography from 172 to 53 and LCI from 70 to 9 tests, also high‐speed video microscopy analyses by 64.3% from 300 to 107 patients, and gastric aspirate sampling by 75.5% from 42 to 9 patients. FFB procedures also decreased by 59.1%, from 142 to 58 patients, and only 15 were after the first reported case of COVID‐19 in our country, and they were all for urgent indications. None of these patients was positive pretesting for COVID‐19 who underwent the FFB. There was no significant decrease in patients' hospitalization due to pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, and primary ciliary dyskinesia.