Premium
Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients with pediatric cystic fibrosis
Author(s) -
Caceres Guido Paulo,
Perez Mariel,
Halac Alicia,
Ferrari Mariela,
Ibarra Manuel,
Licciardone Nieves,
Castaños Claudio,
Gravina Luis P.,
Jimenez Cristina,
Garcia Bournissen Facundo,
Schaiquevich Paula
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.24468
Subject(s) - amikacin , medicine , pharmacokinetics , cmax , cystic fibrosis , volume of distribution , therapeutic drug monitoring , exacerbation , population , regimen , pediatrics , antibiotics , environmental health , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Abstract Introduction Amikacin is commonly used in patients with pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. Amikacin efficacy is related to maximum plasma concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC) ratio >8. Pharmacokinetic data in patients with pediatric CF are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model describing amikacin disposition in patients with pediatric CF. Methods CF patients under 18 years of age with pulmonary exacerbation who received amikacin were enrolled. Patients received different amikacin regimens (30 mg −1 kg −1 day −1 every 8, 12, or 24 hours) depending on the patient's status and hospital protocols. Amikacin serum levels were obtained for therapeutic drug monitoring. PopPK model was developed using MONOLIX Suite‐2018R1 (Lixoft). Results A total of 39 patients (114 amikacin concentrations) were included in this study. Population estimates for the elimination rate constant (k) and the volume of distribution (V) were 0.541 hours −1 and 0.451 L/kg, respectively. Between‐subject and between‐occasion variability were 53% and 16.5% for k and 31% and 22% for V, respectively. Bodyweight was a significant covariate associated with V. Based on simulations, almost 70% of the patients receiving 30 mg −1 kg −1 day −1 every 24 hours would achieve a Cmax/MIC ratio >8 which is an appropriate therapeutic goal while no patient in the other two groups (Q8 and Q12) would achieve that objective. Conclusions The regimen of 30 mg −1 kg −1 day −1 every 24 hours more adequately fulfilled the therapeutic target for amikacin. Although all our patients had good clinical results and a good adverse‐events profile, further studies are necessary to redefine the optimal treatment strategy.