z-logo
Premium
US pediatric pulmonology workforce
Author(s) -
Harris Christopher,
Katkin Julie,
Cataletto Mary,
Dorkin Henry,
Laskosz Laura,
RuchRoss Holly
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.24253
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonologists , workforce , workload , pulmonology , family medicine , certification , pediatrics , intensive care medicine , computer science , political science , law , economics , economic growth , operating system
Aim Children with respiratory conditions benefit from care provided by pediatric pulmonologists. As these physicians are a small portion of the overall pediatric workforce, it is necessary to understand the practices and career plans of these specialists. Methods An internet survey was developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics Division of Workforce and Medical Education Policy and sent to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Chest Physicians who identified as pediatric pulmonary physicians. Results Responses were received from 485 physicians and were compared to the results of a similar survey done in 1997. Of those completing the survey, 63% were male and 37% female, with increased number of females since the earlier poll. The average calculated age was 56 years. They worked 54 h per week, down from 59 h in the prior survey. Pediatric pulmonologists are overwhelmingly clinicians (92%) with major responsibilities for administration (79%), teaching (78%), and research. Basic science research was rarely reported (7%). Pediatric pulmonologists felt that referrals had become more complicated in the recent past. Nearly all planned to maintain Pediatric Pulmonology Sub‐board certification, though one third planned to cut back on clinical workload in the next decade. Many were concerned that the number needed in the profession in a decade would be inadequate with significant concerns about funding for those positions. Conclusion Overall, these results reflect the current state of the workforce and the need to monitor the supply of practitioners in the future.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here