Premium
Prediction of peak oxygen uptake using the modified shuttle test in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis
Author(s) -
Vendrusculo Fernanda M.,
HeinzmannFilho João P.,
Campos Natália E.,
Gheller Mailise F.,
de Almeida Ingrid S.,
Donadio Márcio V. F.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.24237
Subject(s) - medicine , anthropometry , heart rate , cystic fibrosis , exacerbation , oxygen saturation , cardiology , blood pressure , oxygen , chemistry , organic chemistry
Background Several tests may be used to assess exercise intolerance in cystic fibrosis (CF), including the gold standard cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the Modified Shuttle Test (MST). Objective To evaluate the use of the MST as a predictor of peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) and to compare VO 2 peak and maximal heart rate (HRmax) obtained in both tests. Methods Cross‐sectional study including individuals with CF aged between 6 and 20 years old. Participants who were unable to perform the tests and/or presented signs of pulmonary exacerbation were excluded. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical and spirometric values were collected. CPET and the MST were performed in two consecutive outpatient visits. HRmax, peripheral oxygen saturation, dyspnea, and VO 2 peak measured and estimated were compared. Results Twenty‐four patients, mean age 15.7 ± 4.2 years and FEV 1 (% predicted) 76.4 ± 23.8, were included. Mean values of HRmax (bpm) and HRmax in percent of predicted (HRmax%) were lower ( P = 0.01) in the MST (171.6 ± 14.5 and 87.1 ± 7.5) compared to CPET (180.9 ± 10.0 and 91.9 ± 5.4). However, there was no significant differences between tests in the variation (delta) for HRmax and HRmax% ( P = 0.17). A strong correlation ( r = 0.79; P < 0.0001) was found between distance achieved (MST) and VO 2 peak (CPET). The regression model to estimate VO 2 peak resulted in the following equation: VO 2 (mL · kg −1 · min −1 ) = 20.301 + 0.019 × MST distance (meters). There was no difference ( P = 0.50) between VO 2 peak measured (CPET) and estimated by the equation. Conclusion The MST may be an alternative method to evaluate exercise capacity and to predict VO 2 peak in children and adolescents with CF.