Premium
Analysis of the upper airway by the acoustic reflection method in children with mucopolysaccharidosis
Author(s) -
Leboulanger Nicolas,
Louis Bruno,
Vialle Raphaël,
Heron Bénédicte,
Fauroux Brigitte
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.21409
Subject(s) - medicine , mucopolysaccharidosis , airway , reflection (computer programming) , pediatrics , audiology , surgery , computer science , programming language
Background Upper airway obstruction is common in children with mucopolysaccharidosis. The acoustic reflection method is a noninvasive technique that can analyze the caliber of the upper airways. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of the acoustic reflection method in children with mucopolysaccharidosis, and to compare the characteristics of the upper airways evaluated by the acoustic reflection method in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis to matched healthy counterparts. Methods Open, single center, prospective, study. Results Accurate acoustic reflection measurements could be obtained in 7 of 10 patients (mean age: 10.4 ± 3.9 years; mucopolysaccharidosis type II (n = 3); type IV (n = 2), type VI (n = 1), and fucosidosis (n = 1)). The mean minimum cross‐sectional area was lower in mucopolysaccharidosis patients (1.6 ± 0.3 cm 2 ) as compared to 14 healthy counterparts (1.8 ± 0.3 cm 2 ; P = 0.03). The mean resistance of the airways was significantly higher in the MPS group (7.9 ± 1.8 cmH 2 O l −1 sec) as compared to the controls (5.5 ± 1.2 cmH 2 O l −1 sec; P = 0.006). Conclusion This study is the first to analyze the upper airways by the noninvasive acoustic reflection method in children with mucopolysaccharidosis. Due to a lack of cooperation, reliable measurements could only be obtained in 70% of a selected group of patients. Children with mucopolysaccharidosis have significant upper airway obstruction as assessed by the reduction of the minimal cross‐sectional area of the upper airways and the increase in airway resistance. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011; 46:587–594. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.