z-logo
Premium
High‐flow nasal cannula: Impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung injury model
Author(s) -
Frizzola Meg,
Miller Thomas L.,
Rodriguez Maria Elena,
Zhu Yan,
Rojas Jorge,
Hesek Anne,
Stump Angela,
Shaffer Thomas H.,
Dysart Kevin
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.21326
Subject(s) - medicine , nasal cannula , oxygenation , anesthesia , cannula , ventilation (architecture) , positive pressure respiration , intensive care medicine , mechanical ventilation , surgery , mechanical engineering , engineering
High‐flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) has been shown to be more effective than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in reducing intubations and ventilator days. HFNC likely provides mechanisms to support respiratory efficiency beyond application of distending pressure. We reason that HFNC washout of nasopharyngeal dead space impacts CO 2 removal along with oxygenation. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the flow dependence of CO 2 reduction and improved oxygenation during HFNC and the dependence on leak around the nasal prongs. Materials and Methods Neonatal piglets (n = 13; 2–6 kg) were injured with IV oleic acid and supported with HFNC at 2 through 8 L/min. High and low leak around the nasal prongs was accomplished by using single and double prong cannulae, respectively. Measurement of hemodynamic, respiratory and blood gas parameters were made at each setting following 10 min for physiologic equilibration. Tracheal pressures were recorded by transmural catheters. Results With HFNC, CO 2 trended downward in a flow‐dependent manner independent of leak. Oxygenation and tracheal pressures increased in a flow‐dependent manner with the greatest effect during double prong. At 8 L/min, tracheal pressures did not exceed 6 ± 1 cmH 2 O. Conclusions HFNC improves gas exchange in a flow‐dependent manner; double prong had greater impact on O 2; single prong had greater impact on CO 2 elimination. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011; 46:67–74. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here