Premium
Single breath versus panting technique in salbutamol delivery through a 750 mL spacing device
Author(s) -
James R. W.,
Masters I. B.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/ppul.1950080410
Subject(s) - salbutamol , medicine , anesthesia , bronchodilator agents , asthma , bronchodilator
Spacing devices have been widely advocated for asthmatic patients having difficulty actuating metered aerosols and co‐ordinating inspiration. Studies have generally supported the slow inspiration/breath hold technique. This requires conscious respiratory control. Such control is often not possible in young children; consequently panting techniques are widely recommended. The panting technique has not been studied. The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator effectiveness of panting and the single breath maneuver, each followed by a breath hold, and each at functional residual capacity (FRC), using a Volumatic Spacer®. The study design was a randomly allocated cross‐over assessment of bronchodilator response for each technique. The drug dosage was controlled by limiting the inspired volumes of gas (single and cummulative) to the pretested inspiratory capacity. Two hundred micrograms of salbutamol was delivered into the spacer. Twenty‐one patients were entered in the study and 15 (mean age ± SD = 10.9 ± 3.3 years) completed the protocol. There was no significant difference in bronchodilator response between the two groups. We conclude that the panting and the single breath techniques are equally effective in children of this age group. Pediatr Pulmonol 1990; 8:263‐267.